VI
HOW THE MONEY IS ISSUED
CHECKS AND CURRENCY
AND THEIR BASIS
A money system is a vast accounting mechanism. The private accounts
that are kept on the millions of ledgers of private tradesmen
are all auxiliary to this master ledger which determines the meaning
of the terminology in which these individual accounts are kept.
Disturb or distort the master ledger and you affect likewise all
the millions of subsidiary ledgers in the economy. Society must
have a stable money system to preserve its own stability.
When businessmen resolve to set up a money system, they agree
to hold in trust for each other goods and services that are pledged
against the drafts which they have issued in the form of money.
These values—that are held in trust by all for any who may present
a money draft therefor—constitute a vast pool, not housed at
one place, but scattered throughout the trading sphere. This vast
pool of goods and services is the basis or backing for the outstanding
money supply. "Reserves" and metal hoards are but window
dressing. Only that which is purchaseable is back of money.
While all the traders in the Exchange hold values in trust, none
knows who actually may present an ownership claim therefor by
the tender of money, and whether there is warrant for such tender.
Therefore there must be a central bookkeeper, with an all-seeing
eye, that keeps account of who holds values and who holds claims
thereto. Some means of conveying this information to and from
the central bookkeeper must be available.
For the purpose of fixing in our minds the fact that money exchange
is accountancy and that no value attaches to the money instruments,
let us assume that the central bookkeeper operates by telephone,
without money instruments. A telephones the central office and
states that B has ordered some merchandise at a given money price
and asks whether B's account will permit the charge. On being
assured that it will, the goods are shipped and the central bookkeeper
debits B's account and credits A's. Thus a perfect money transaction
has been consummated because values were stated in terms of a
money unit and value has moved only one way, and from which there
has arisen a debit and a credit warranted by the rules of the
money system. Yet no instruments have been issued, and thus there
is nothing material upon which the mind can fix a value or attach
a superstitious power. This demonstrates that money is first of
all a concept in accountancy and that it may be expressed verbally.
We may go further and assume that, in confirmation of the above
transaction between A and B, B sent to the central bookkeeper
a duplicate of A's order. Still we think of the transaction as
a simple bookkeeping transaction and there is no superstition
attaching to the duplicate order.
Let us hold to this bookkeeping concept and assume that, with
the order for the goods, B sent via A an order known as a check
directing the central bookkeeper to debit his account and credit
A's account, and that A sent this to the central bookkeeper instead
of a duplicate order. In spite of the fact that the check is known
as a money instrument, it is still nothing but a bookkeeping memorandum
—and is not in the least mystifying.
Now we will assume that B calls up the bookkeeper and says that
it is inconvenient to write checks for petty transactions; and
asks if the bookkeeper hasn't some plan for obviating check writing.
The bookkeeper says, "yes. I have some bills, in different
denominations and coins, that require no signature and are good
in anybody's hands." B asks how he can get them. The bookkeeper
says: "send me your check for the amount you want and I'll
give them to you. I will debit your account for your check in
the regular way." Now, because nicely engraved pieces of
paper and pretty coins meet the eye, we are in the zone where
the greatest superstition arises. To most persons these instruments
are money, and nothing else is money. Yet these are but bookkeeping
instruments like the check and the duplicate order. In essence,
they are the same, but the check is better suited to the purpose
visualized than is the duplicate order, and the currency is better
suited than is the check for certain purposes. Neither the check
nor the currency accomplished anything more than did the telephone
call; all were instrumentalities of bookkeeping and each effected
a money transaction.
How does the currency spring into existence? As we have seen,
someone had to order and authorize it. The bookkeeping method
is to set up a special currency authority who has caused to be
fabricated the pieces of paper and coins. When a check is written
for it, the amount of the check is debited to the account of the
check writer who receives the currency and the same amount is
credited to the currency authority. Thus the currency is just
as much a creation of the check writer as is the check which requisitioned
it. It becomes the equivalent of a certified check payable to
bearer. No mystery, no magic, nothing awesome. When the currency
returns to the bookkeeper, it is credited to whoever returns it
and charged back to the currency authority where it is held subject
to some other requisition for it. Note that the currency sprang
out of a book account, just like the check and that both, therefore,
have the same basis.
The currency under the valun system will of course be manufactured
at some central plant where adequate safeguards will be set up
against theft; and the counterfeiting problem will exist as it
does with any money system. It will be the duty of the Central
Board of Valun Exchanges to provide the currency in bills and
coins on demand of the various Exchanges, so as to provide uniformity
and central control.
The promise to pay and promise to redeem or exchange—forms
that are used on existing money instruments—will not be used.
There is nothing to pay and nothing to redeem in true money. Its
purpose is to requisition goods and services, and not to requisition
some other form of money. The check form need but say, "Credit
the account of .................... and debit the account of the
undersigned." The currency bills need but carry the word
VALUN and the denomination. Coins need carry only the word VALUN
with the fraction they represent such as 1/100, 1/20, 1/10, 1/4,
1/2. The name of the 1/100 would be cend, (Esperanto) the five
cend piece might be called the quin, the ten cend piece, the tenth.
The material from which the coins would be stamped should be the
most inexpensive that would serve the purposes of wear and weight.
Some concession might be made to the vending machine industry.
To enable the valun system to render the check clearing service
rendered by banks—without their luxurious quarters and
extensive units and branches—it is proposed that only
one Exchange be set up for each state; in any satisfactory quarters,
even if it be in an industrial section. This plan precludes the
necessity for members to visit the Exchange, and relies entirely
upon the mails for conveying deposits and returning vouchers.
Such a plan must provide the means for drawing and depositing
currency and to serve this need it is proposed to have Valun Currency
Counters in business neighborhoods.
NEIGHBORHOOD CURRENCY
COUNTERS
A Valun Currency Counter would be authorized by a franchise issued
by the Valun Exchange to an applicant member located in a business
neighborhood where there might be sufficient demand to justify.
The primary function of the V.C.C. would be to accept deposits
of currency or checks for currency on demand. Members requiring
currency would issue checks payable to the Counter dealer—
who would surrender the currency just as is now done by banks.
If a member wished to dispose of currency, the Counter dealer
would issue his check for it. If the member wished to store cash
with the Counter dealer overnight or the weekend, he could do
so and be guaranteed against loss. The Counter dealer would of
course have to provide himself with a safe and adequate burglary
protection. The currency would be available to the Counter dealer
from the Exchange by some safe conveyance but it is believed that
there would be but little occasion for currency to return to the
Exchange—because a dealer finding himself long would probably
also find some other dealer, in the same city or neighborhood,
who was short—and who would buy the surplus with his check.
The secondary function of the V. C. C. dealers would be to buy
valuns for dollars, or dollars for valuns, at the current rate
of exchange. Since all valun members would (at the outset) be
obliged to do business on both a dollar basis and a valun basis,
and since some non-members would sometimes come into possession
of valuns, the need for such "foreign exchange" service
is obvious. The existence of such a money market would serve the
additional purpose of establishing an official differential between
the dollar and the valun, for the purpose of pricing goods and
services in both units.
The Counter dealers would be organized in the Valun Currency
Counters Association and would report their valun-dollar dealings
daily to their central office where the exchange rates would be
determined after business hours every day, and wired to the members
of the Association every morning. These rates would of course
be determined by the law of supply and demand. If valuns be in
greater demand than dollars, the dollar price of valuns would
rise. If there be greater demand for dollars, the dollar price
of valuns would decline. It is expected that there would be a
continuous trend favorable to the valun (i.e., the dollar price
of valuns would show a trend rise) but there may be reactions,
and the daily variation would probably be irregular.
The V.C.C. Association, as it announced the daily exchange rate,
would supply a guide to merchants for the double pricing of their
wares in valuns and dollars. Thus if the valun rate were announced
as $6.65, it would mean that any merchandise bought by the merchant
on a valun basis and given the usual mark-up, would be multiplied
6.65 times to get the dollar price. If an item be bought on a
dollar basis and given the usual markup, a deduction of 85% would
be made to arrive at the valun price. This percentage would be
announced publicly every day so that buyers, as well as sellers,
would know the differential.
There would be no agreement among dealers to follow these price
differentials and this would not affect the scale of prices of
different dealers. However, if a dealer did not follow the differential
in his valun and dollar pricing, the tendency would be for buyers
to purchase, at the Currency Counters, valuns or dollars whichever
gave them an advantage with the merchant who had failed to follow
the official differential in his pricing. This in turn would work
to the disadvantage of the merchant when he came to convert his
dollars or valuns, one into the other. The influence of the Valun
Currency Counters would therefore be to make the differential
between dollar and valun uniform in all shops, however much their
price scales might vary. At the outset, the practice would be
to quote prices exclusively in dollars, with the discount for
valuns. As valun trading gained the ascendency the practice would
probably be adopted of quoting exclusively in valuns, with the
premium rate in dollars.
The Valun Currency Counters would be privately owned and conducted
under the terms of the franchise issued by the Valun Exchange.
All services rendered by them would be subject to an appropriate
fee which would be stipulated by the Exchange or regulated by
competition. Whatever the cost to the members might be, it would
be less than the cost of maintaining branch Exchanges after the
manner of the present banking system with its many units and branches
luxuriously equipped.
The checks that pass through the Exchange would be its continuous
stream of income by reason of a charge on each check cleared,
and this per check charge should be minimized by economies wherever
possible. There is in the valun system no need to do the pretentious
thing—to inspire public awe and blind confidence. There
is no occasion for window dressing or display of any kind. The
system is to be a matter of fact institution—serving the
simple needs of exchange, reflecting the democratic control of
its members, and serving them essentially as community bookkeeper.
|