| 10. To the
editor of Money (May 1945)
Various readers and non-readers of Private Enterprise Money have
likened the valun system of private enterprise money to the plans
of Proudhon and Greene. I would like to make the distinction clear.
Proudhon, who saw clearly that it is the labor of the people
that gives substance to money, proposed a mutual credit plan for
the issuance of bills of exchange in terms of the franc. Greene,
the American Proudhon, proposed a mutual credit plan for the issuance
of currency bills in terms of the dollar. There have been other
mutual credit plans, usually called Giro plans, in Europe. All
these accept the political monetary unit and make no effort to
limit the government's issue power. They are aimed at escape from
the restrictions and impositions of the banks, but not the perversions
of government.
A mutual money plan, to be successful, must be restricted to
private enterprisers (employers, employees, and self-employers)
so far as issue power is concerned, because they both buy and
sell and, thus, redeem as well as issue. Any mutual credit plan
can be perverted and ultimately ruined if the government is given
the issue power.
Under the valun system, governments—national, state and
local—would be entitled only to class B membership, thus
limiting them to drawing against a credit balance, whereas all
private enterprisers would be permitted to draw against a debit
balance, the only method by which money can be created.
|